Educational reference

Peptide library

Dihexa

Your guide to this compound.

Mechanism illustrationEnlarge
Dihexa: Medical scientific diagram. Open full size to read labels; evidence and limitations appear in the profile.
Educational illustration · Read the evidence and limitations below.

Evidence in perspective

An expression of concern and a retraction are distinct editorial actions; both reduce confidence in the affected development claims. The retracted paper is not valid affirmative support. Unaffected independent evidence and human outcomes remain necessary.

About this assessment

Existing source snapshot critically reassessed.

Based on the selected source scope described in this profile, often an indexed abstract. Full methods and clinician sign-off remain pending; no systematic-review claim.

Editorial assessment · 2026-09-07

Source 1 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source 2 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source 3 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source 4 · www.fda.gov

Who was studied

Rodent models and neuronal cultures in the early development literature; publication-status notices were checked separately.

What the sources found

The 2013 development paper reported rodent learning and cell-culture findings, but carries a 2021 notice of concern. It does not establish cognitive benefit in people.

Editorial notice, read alongside the 2013 development report.

Source · Notice of Concern for PMID 23055539

Regulatory scope

U.S.: FDA lists this substance among withdrawn compounding nominations with safety concerns; this does not establish approval.

What remains unknown

The 2013 notice of concern and the 2014 paper’s retraction are different editorial actions. Later independent studies and human trial registries still require systematic review. Targeted source snapshot, not a full clinical review. Product stability, interactions and jurisdiction-specific authorization remain outstanding.

How it works

HGF/c-Met signaling is a proposed mechanism. The 2014 paper used to support this mechanism was retracted in 2025; this profile does not treat that paper as reliable proof of the pathway.

HGF/c-Met signaling is a proposed mechanism. The 2014 paper used to support this mechanism was retracted in 2025; this profile does not treat that paper as reliable proof of the pathway.

Publication status only; the retraction is not new biological evidence.

Source · Retraction notice; relation to PMID 25187433

Preclinical research

The catalog primarily cites laboratory or animal research. Human benefit, a safe dose and long-term risks cannot be inferred from those findings.

Understanding the evidence

Reported adverse effects

  • FDA reports missing human exposure and safety data for dihexa acetate; this does not establish tolerability.

FDA statement concerns the acetate drug substance.

Source · Dihexa acetate row

Contraindications

  • A complete clinical contraindication and interaction profile has not been established in this review.

Preclinical research

The catalog primarily cites laboratory or animal research. Human benefit, a safe dose and long-term risks cannot be inferred from those findings.

Understanding the evidence

Sources used for this snapshot

Source 1 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source 2 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source 3 · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Source 4 · www.fda.gov

Claim-by-claim evidence

Mechanism

HGF/c-Met signaling is a proposed mechanism. The 2014 paper used to support this mechanism was retracted in 2025; this profile does not treat that paper as reliable proof of the pathway.

Publication status only; the retraction is not new biological evidence.

Retraction notice; relation to PMID 25187433

Benefits

The 2013 development paper reported rodent learning and cell-culture findings, but carries a 2021 notice of concern. It does not establish cognitive benefit in people.

Historical animal/culture report carrying a notice of concern; not accepted clinical evidence.

Abstract; linked notice PMID 34551989

Findings

The 2013 development paper reported rodent learning and cell-culture findings, but carries a 2021 notice of concern. It does not establish cognitive benefit in people.

Editorial notice, read alongside the 2013 development report.

Notice of Concern for PMID 23055539

Adverseeffects

FDA reports missing human exposure and safety data for dihexa acetate; this does not establish tolerability.

FDA statement concerns the acetate drug substance.

Dihexa acetate row

References

  1. NOTICE OF CONCERN ON THIS PAPER: Evaluation of metabolically stabilized angiotensin IV analogs as procognitive/antidementia agents. 2013.

    PMID: 23055539

    Open

  2. Notice of Concern: McCoy AT, Benoist CC, Wright JW, Kawas LH, Bule-Ghogare JM, Zhu M, Appleyard SM, Wayman GA, and Harding JW (2013) Evaluation of Metabolically Stabilized Angiotensin IV Analogs as Procognitive/Antidementia Agents, <i>J Pharmacol Exp Ther</i>, 344: 141-154; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.199497. 2021.

    PMID: 34551989

    Open

  3. Retraction notice to "The Procognitive and Synaptogenic Effects of Angiotensin IV-Derived Peptides Are Dependent on Activation of the Hepatocyte Growth Factor/c-Met System" [J Pharmacol Exp Ther 351 (2014) 390-402]. 2025.

    PMID: 40312093

    Open

  4. FDA. Compounding substances with potential significant safety risks.

    Open

Catalog review date: Sep 7, 2026. This date alone does not establish independent clinical review.

Open image for full-resolution zoom